add taglines to finite-field.{2,3,4}

This commit is contained in:
queue-miscreant 2025-08-05 03:32:38 -05:00
parent 93889bc2a9
commit 46128385fc
3 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
--- ---
title: "Exploring Finite Fields, Part 2: Matrix Boogaloo" title: "Exploring Finite Fields, Part 2: Matrix Boogaloo"
description: | description: |
... How do we extend a field non-symbolically?
format: format:
html: html:
html-math-method: katex html-math-method: katex

View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
--- ---
title: "Exploring Finite Fields, Part 3: Roll a d20" title: "Exploring Finite Fields, Part 3: Roll a d20"
description: | description: |
... When we extend fields with matrices, what other structures do we encounter?
format: format:
html: html:
html-math-method: katex html-math-method: katex
@ -658,18 +658,18 @@ markdown $ ("$$" ++) $ (++ "$$") $ intercalate " \\quad " [
We now have a correspondence between three elements of *A*~5~ and PSL(2, 5). We now have a correspondence between three elements of *A*~5~ and PSL(2, 5).
We can "run" both sets of the generators until we associate all elements to one another. We can "run" both sets of the generators until we associate all elements to one another.
This is most visually appealing to see as a Cayley graph: This is most visually appealing to see as a Cayley graph[^3]:
[ [
![ ![
Cayley graph showing an isomorphism between A5 and PSL(2, 5). <br> Cayley graph showing an isomorphism between A5 and PSL(2, 5). <br>
Order-2 elements are red, order-3 elements are green, and order-5 elements are blue. Order-2 elements are red, order-3 elements are green, and order-5 elements are blue.
Purple arrows are order-5 generators, orange arrows are order-2 generators[^4]. Purple arrows are order-5 generators, orange arrows are order-2 generators.
](./a5_psl25_cayley.png){.narrow} ](./a5_psl25_cayley.png){.narrow}
](./a5_psl24_cayley.png) ](./a5_psl24_cayley.png)
[^4]: Different generators appear to be used for *A* and *B* in the above image [^3]: Different generators appear to be used for *A* and *B* due to some
due to some self-imposed turbulence when writing the original post. self-imposed turbulence when writing the original post.
Under projective equality, both are the same as our choices of *A* and *B*. Under projective equality, both are the same as our choices of *A* and *B*.

View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
--- ---
title: "Exploring Finite Fields, Part 4: The Power of Forgetting" title: "Exploring Finite Fields, Part 4: The Power of Forgetting"
description: | description: |
... Or: how I stopped learned to worrying and appreciate the Monad.
format: format:
html: html:
html-math-method: katex html-math-method: katex